Last Saturday, we had a bunch of friends over for dinner and the talk turned to productivity, about which we write in Chapter 1 (p.13): “Productivity is an excellent way to evaluate a country’s ability to provide an improving standard of living for its people. Only through increases in productivity can the standard of living increase“.
But here was the gist of the conversation— From a pediatrician: “We have a practice of 22 doctors and business is stable. Six staff turned over this year, but because of the economy, we only replaced two. The work was split among the rest, who each got more hours”. From an ophthalmologist: “I am a sole practitioner, but when two staff left this year, I only replaced one.” From a lawyer: ” My firm made offers to two dozen new associates this year. But with the downturn, we rescinded the start dates by one year. Current associates will pick up the slack”. From a second attorney: “We did exactly the same with new hires. But we placed each of them with a non-profit for the year and picked up their ( lower) salaries”.
The Wall Street Journal writes about “superjobs“, a situation where employees do more than one job’s worth of
With more productive workers supporting a growing population, the employment rate and living standards are falling. This can make for a good classroom discussion as your students provide their view of our productivity gains. Perhaps this is lean management at its best.
