Guest Post: Location– Facility Repurposing Failures

Prof. Howard Weiss is providing Guest Posts while I am travelling.

Figure 8.1 of your Heizer/Render/Munson textbook lists 6 factors affecting the decision about what site to select at a local level. Another factor at the site level is whether or not it is possible to take over an already existing site. In two previous blogs I have discussed successful repurposing of facilities in general and repurposing of closed Kmart buildings. Unfortunately, not all repurposing decisions turn out well. One case below shows the problems to the organization taking over the facility while the second demonstrates the problems to the township in which the facility is repurposed.

Philadelphia Parking Authority The Philadelphia Parking Authority (PPA) decided that it could repurpose a decaying 16-acre Exelon steam regeneration plant into an administration building and an impound lot. In 2019 PPA signed a lease for this property which had been vacant since it was closed in 1985. The owner agreed to improve both the 500,000 square foot administration building and the parking lots. In 2021 workers were moved into the building. There were sewage and bathroom problems and in a few weeks PPA pulled its workers out of the facility. The parking authority has ended its lease and is currently in the course of creating a new headquarters at another location in Philadelphia. The PPA will be reimbursed over $2,000,000 for the project but even with the reimbursement the estimated loss to PPA, not including wasted time, for this failed location is over $1,000,000. 

Lockheed Martin Site In 1995, Pennsylvania offered Lockheed Martin, a defense contractor, an incentive package of grants and loans worth $25 million to relocate employees to Newtown, Bucks County, PA. Your textbook notes, in the OM in Action box on “Iowa – Home of Corn and Facebook” in Chapter 8, that studies show that “incentives did not substantially contribute to economic performance”. Indeed, this was the case with Lockheed as it decided to close the facility by 2015. Closing cost the township roughly $560,000 in income tax from Lockheed’s 1,200 employees.

The drug company KVK Tech purchased the site for $12.5 million in 2015. Currently the site is barely used and the parking lots are nearly empty. In addition, local, state and federal officials have had difficulty with KVK using trailers instead of expanding, being in non-compliance on waste water and having flawed manufacturing processes.

 Classroom Discussion Questions: 

1. Name a facility that generally is not repurposed. 
2. What incentives does your city or county or state give to companies for locating in your area?