Guest Post: Location Analysis and Community Attitudes

Prof. Howard Weiss, developer of the Excel OM and POM software that we provide free with our text, explains NIMBY.

In considering location strategy, as discussed in the Location chapter (Ch. 8) of Heizer/ Render/ Munson, it is critical to recognize that site selection is influenced not only by operational and cost factors but also by the social and political climate of the host community. One powerful expression of community resistance is encapsulated in the acronym NIMBY—“Not In My Back Yard.” The 1970’s term describes a paradoxical stance: residents often acknowledge the necessity of a facility or infrastructure project but strongly oppose its placement within their immediate vicinity.

A recent example can be found in Middletown, PA, where residents protested the conversion of a decommissioned coin mint into a warehouse. While the project promised potential economic benefits, community members expressed concerns over increased traffic congestion, heightened noise levels, possible pollution, and the erosion of local character. Such reactions are emblematic of broader NIMBY dynamics, where objections are rooted in both tangible and intangible perceived costs.

In addition to the Middleton commonly cited reasons for opposition, others include include health risks, pollution, crime, diminished aesthetic beauty, property values, security, parking, scenic views, access to natural resources, and environmental concerns (such as  habitat disruption and air and water contamination).

NIMBY disputes span a wide range of industries and public projects. In the U.S., notable examples include the halted completion of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant on Long Island; resistance to homeless shelters/housing in San Francisco; opposition to offshore wind farms near Cape Cod; battles over California’s high-speed rail; community pushback against cell tower installations in suburban neighborhoods; and municipal bans on hydraulic fracturing in cities such as Denton, Texas. Other contentious proposals have involved the expansion of hazardous waste landfills (East Liverpool, Ohio), medical marijuana dispensaries, and psychiatric treatment centers.

NIMBY is not confined to the U.S. In the U.K., plans to build a prison near the town of Thornton faced intense local opposition. In Australia, residents of Eastern Creek fought against the development of a waste-to-energy incinerator.

For operations managers, the implication is clear: location strategy cannot be determined by quantitative factors alone. Understanding and addressing community attitudes is essential to minimizing conflict, avoiding costly delays, and ensuring long-term project viability.

Classroom discussion questions:

1. Why is this an OM issue?
2. Have any students faced a NIMBY development in their communities? The results?