OM in the News:WSJ Gives Innovative Products Awards

We all know the importance of new product development (see Ch.5 and Fig.5.2). Companies live or die by the success of their new products…and the strength of the US as an economic power depends on our ability to continually innovate.

Each year the Journal names its Technology Innovation Award winners. This article details this year’s winners, looks at what happened to last year’s , and projects what advances will win in the future. Its an exciting classroom topic.

My two favorite winners in 2010 are: (1) TruFocals, eyeglasses the wearer can adjust manually to give clearer vision for reading, computer work, or gazing into the distance: and (2) a paper-thin, flexible computer screen that can be bent or rolled.

The odds against successfully creating and selling a new product are about 500-to-1. But a gardener friend of mine who worked for 10 years to develop a new garbage can (the world needs a new garbage can?!) just got his 1st royalty check–close to $1 million!

Discussion questions:

1.Check out last year’s WSJ winners. How did they do?

2.Name several recent products that became immediate successes.

3. What firms are the leaders in innovation with new products?

OM in the News: Mass Customization at BMW

BMW at its Spartanburg S.C. plant along with 170 suppliers wants to build a custom  X5 sport utility vehicle for you. The Spartanburg plant thinks they can do it for you as they already export 70% of the vehicles it makes to more than 130 countries; each with its own specifications. And they do it with 18 owner’s manual languages.   The number of custom options includes 500 side-mirrow combinations, 1300 front-bumper combinations, 2,500 possible wiring harnesses, 5,000 seat and 9,000 center-console combinations. 

BMW wants 4 to 6 weeks to make the custom ordered SUV, but orders are locked in with a lead time of only 5 days. Dealer software is closely tied to BMW’s manufacturing and supply chain, with workers getting the word on what car they are building via overhead screens. The frequent changes required by variations in custom orders complicates  every thing from entering the order, to procurement, to moving parts to the line, and balancing the assembly line. Customization is not cheap. But BMW is betting that mass customization for a premium priced car will pay off.

Discussion questions:

Why don’t more auto purchasers request custom-made cars (the car they really want)?

How do we balance an assembly line with many different products coming down the assembly line (the article says the standard time is 106 seconds)?