Author: Jay Heizer

OM in the News: Location Incentives

As reported in the WSJ (Sept.22, 2010 p.C8)  Navistar International Corp. has just accepted a location incentive package from Illinois. The package equate to over $22,000 per job. The journal reports that about $15,000 for each new job is the national average, but some equate to more than $200,000 per job.

In addition to jobs Navistar is expected to also spend about $205 million including an upgrade of it’s headquarter and a new parts facility.Some research suggests that in the long run a city/county/state is better off investing in honest government, good worker’s comp. practices, education, and other quality of life issues. And as the text notes, some of these incentive deals do not always work out for the company or the state.

Location incentives,  potential job creation, and expense to tax payers vs other uses for tax money, can generate a lively class discussion.

Discussion Question:

1. How do location incentives relate to the location criteria discussed in Chapter 8?

2. Can you identify some ‘not so good’ results from location incentives?

3. Is there any consensus regarding how tax payer should be spent vis-a-vis incentives or quality of life issues that  benefit all taxpayers?

OM in the News: Whirlpool Domestic Expansion

Ref: WSJ, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010

 Wednesday’s WSJ reports on Whirlpool’s $300 million  upgrade of domestic manufacturing. Both the Cleveland Tennessee plant and the Clyde Ohio plant are seeing major upgrades.  Whirlpool is aggressively restructuring their North American plants… which includes closing plants in Evansville, Ind., Oxford, Miss. and a Michigan plant.  The Clyde plant  is to reduce time to build a washer by 10% and boost output by more than 10%.   

Also while great concern is continually exhibited in the press about the fact that manufacturing employment continues to decline… as OM profs we need to explain (apparently again and again) that manufacturing production and productivity continues to expand. Manufacturing employment does continue to drop ….

But the US is still the largest manufacturing country in the world with  annual productivity increases on the order of 3.4% since 1950.  

This article open a great discussion:

(1) about Whirlpools 2006 purchase of Maytag (industry consolidations… economies of scale) and

(2) the fact that while a plant in Mexico was considered, Whirlpool is making these expansion in the US.

(3)  You can also ask students by how much manufacturing employment drops each year (the article says .1%) or what percent of the work force is employed in mfg.  (the text says 11.2%, but perhaps lower this year).

(4) What are  the implications if manufacturing employment was not dropping … what if employment had never dropped in agriculture or the number of  telephone operators.