OM in the News: Toyota’s New Modular Design

toyotaToyota just announced a revamped manufacturing process—built on sharing components among vehicles—that the world’s best-selling auto maker says will produce half its vehicles by 2020 and slash costs. But its unveiling follows a path blazed in recent years by German rival VW—a reversal for the Japanese pioneer, whose production system was for decades seen as the gold standard, giving the world such manufacturing concepts as “just-in-time inventory” and “continuous improvement.”

As Toyota developed its new manufacturing process, it found itself chasing Volkswagen, which in 2012 launched vehicles built on its own new global manufacturing platform, reports The Wall Street Journal (March 27, 2015). VW’s effort to lower the huge development costs for 9 car brands produced a building-block system that allows it to develop platforms on which multiple brands can be built in the same factory and often on the same production line, a savings over designs that often required one factory per model. “It used to be: one plant, one line, one model,” said VW’s CEO. The system sets specifications for the basic underpinning of a vehicle and for attaching components from brakes and powertrains to engines.

The effort will save Toyota 30% of the upfront development costs of a new vehicle. Its so-called MQB platform allows multiple models, body styles and brands to be built in the same factory, reducing costs in several ways. The introduction of smaller manufacturing lines, for instance, is expected to reduce initial plant investment by approximately 40%. And the company’s new production process is built on much more expansive component sharing than its existing platform-sharing strategies. Toyota said it plans to increase the use of same or similar components, regardless of vehicle size and styles, allowing it to order parts in bulk and save costs through greater economies of scale.

Classroom discussion questions:

1. Why is the modular design so important?

2. What is the MQB platform?

 

OM in the News: The Promise and Perils of Modular Design

If you are an auto aficionado ( and who isn’t), you will enjoy the Wall Street Journal (March 10-11, 2012) article sizing up the recent Geneva auto show, which highlights all the new vehicles and concept cars. Although half the article lambasted the new Bentley SUV (photo shown here) as “graceless, frightening, cynical, and terrible attempt to translate Bentley’s sleek styling” into a Range Rover, the heart of the piece was really on how OM plays a major role in design today through modularity (see Ch.5).  Indeed, Bentley and Lamborghini  are just 2 of 11 brands to share VW’s SUV architecture. VW will soon be building all its cars under only 4 modular “toolboxes”; one for city cars, one for mid-size cars, one for midengine sports cars, and one for large vehicles such as the Bentley SUV, Audi 8, and Porsche Panamera.

Eleven brands, scores of different models– from tiny to enormous and slow to fast–all with 4 toolboxes. The new Audi A3, for example, shares a platform with the VW Polo/Golf/Passat/ Tiguan, as well as the Seat Leon and Skoda Octavia. Up to 44 vehicles will be built on the platform, resulting in material savings of 20% and facility savings of 30%. This is because vehicles built in the modular system allow production to be modularized. VW will be able to rapidly shift production from one factory to another to anticipate regional demand and capacity. Similarly, Fiat/Chrysler is building its new Maserati SUV on a shared Jeep Cherokee platform.

The prevailing wisdom is that successful companies will have to reach a critical mass–6-8 million vehicles/year– to achieve economies of scale, most-favored status among suppliers, and to avoid fatal exposure in any one market. Only Pagani’s Huayra hypercar–all 700 HP and $1.5 million price tag–will have 4,700 custom-made parts ; it does not share a single switch, light bulb, or horn with any other car on the planet.

Discussion questions:

1. Why is modular design so important in the auto industry?

2. Which auto manufacturers have already obtained “critical mass”?