OM in the News: Wal-Mart Checks Out Mobile Checkout

How can operations management play a role in cost savings at Wal-Mart? Check out this quote from The Wall Street Journal (Sept.1-2, 2012): “The company says it spends $12 million per second on cashiers’ wages in the U.S.”  At $12 million per second, it is no wonder that Wal-Mart is testing a checkout system that allows shoppers to use their mobile phones to scan items as they walk through stores and pay at self-service kiosks, skipping the cashiers’ lines.

Called “Scan and Go,” the mobile-payment app is the latest attempt by the Wal-Mart OM group to reduce long checkout lines.  The system does not yet allow customers to pay with their mobile device, but is meant to make scanning easier for them. Wal-Mart also just announced plans to add more self-checkout lanes, as only 1,600 of the 4,500 Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club stores in the U.S. include this option.

Retailers have been using self-checkout for more than a decade to try to reduce labor costs and speed up transactions, but not all chains have been happy with their experiences. Companies like grocery chain Albertsons and housewares giant IKEA  are actually eliminating self-checkout, citing lost revenue, theft, and lack of interaction with customers. Many shoppers also complain the self-service systems are balky.

The scanning idea could serve as a loyalty program for Wal-Mart, which does not issue discount cards to customers in exchange for the ability to collect data on their shopping habits. Scanning will allow the firm to collect data on what customers buy and how long they spend in stores–and to send shoppers coupons for competitive products in real-time as they scan items. “If you scan peanut butter and immediately a $2-off coupon pops up to buy a competing brand, Wal-Mart can change customer’s behaviors right there in the aisle,” says an industry consultant.

Discussion questions:

1. What are the advantages of mobile scanning/checkout?

2. Why are self-checkouts not universal?

OM in the News: Tracking Your Bags Online at Delta Airlines

Under  pressure from the federal government to deal with lost luggage issues, airlines are responding with some unique customer service  approaches–thanks to OM. For example, we noted in this blog a few months back that Alaska Airlines has set up new processes that guarantee bags will arrive within 20 minutes after the plane parks at the gate–or else customers get $20 or 2,000 points.

The Wall Street Journal (April 23-24,2011) just reported that Delta Airlines has started a new online service to let customers track the whereabouts of their checked bags. Launched a few weeks ago, passengers can follow their bags from scanning at check-in, to the flight they are loaded on, and then to arrival at baggage claim. Delta says, “Letting passengers see where their bags are can cut down on worries and calls when a bag doesn’t show up on the carousel on time”.

Tracking can be done on Delta’s website with a mobile phone or a laptop. And if a bag is lost, the passenger can now file a claim online at the same site. If you have ever had to wait for a bag that never arrived, then queued up for an hour to file a claim —and who hasn’t— this use of technology in service (see Ch.7) is a clever advancement.

The concept, of course, is not new. FedEx has been tracking packages for decades. United Airlines has for a year used FedEx to offer overnight delivery of golf bags, skis, and suitcases ($79-$99 each way), and allowed passengers to track their possessions online. And Ford used to offer buyers a chance to track their car through the production process.

Delta, by the way, is already well below the industry average for lost bags, and has improved 27% from last year’s 4.04 mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers.

Discussion questions:

1. Is this really a critical new service? Or does it resemble the Ford marketing tool?

2. What are some other service technologies the airlines can employ?

3. Why do airlines have vastly different lost baggage rates?

OM in the News: Hi, I’m iPad–May I Take Your Order?

In our Table 7.4 (from the Process Strategy chapter) we list several examples of technology’s impact on services, including “wireless orders from waiters to the kitchen”. I think we may need to update this idea for the next edition! USA Today (Feb.16,2011) just reported that a new restaurant chain is opening soon in S. California in which each of the 60 tables will have an industrial-strength iPad for customers to design and place their orders.  Diners at Stacked: Food Well Built will use the iPads not just as menus and to order, but to pay for the meals as well.

The future of restaurant ordering and design may well be digital. Two-thirds of young people (18-34 year olds) responded to a national survey that they’d favor a restaurant with high-tech gear.

Others have tried iPads already: NY’s Kennedy and La Guardia airports have them at restaurants near Delta Air gates; and Bone’s Restaurant in Atlanta found that wine sales jumped 20% since iPads were added 6 months ago.

Will this be the future for all restaurants? Certainly your students will find the topic interesting for class discussion.

Discussion questions:

1. What are the downsides of this new technology? The advantages?

2. Where else might the iPad concept work besides restaurants?