OM in the News: China, Inc. Moves the Factory Floor to Africa

95% of the 600 employees at Hisense' Cape Town plant are South African
95% of the 600 employees at Hisense’ Cape Town plant are South African

Each TV motherboard that rolls off the Hisense Co. factory line in Cape Town moves China a tiny step toward a new global manufacturing base. But although the line’s South African technicians are producing at the same clip of 70 seconds per board as their Chinese counterparts, there’s a hitch: Hisense factories in China use half as many workers to make the same product. In South Africa, 1 technician monitors one machine. In China, the company’s technicians monitor 2 machines apiece.

Faced with rising labor costs at home, Chinese companies are setting up new factories on the continent and hiring more Africans, reports The Wall Street Journal (May 15, 2014). The companies’ efforts will test whether the masters of low-cost manufacturing can be as productive in Africa as they are in China. The average monthly wage for a low-skilled Ethiopian factory worker, for example, is about 25% of the pay for a comparable Chinese worker. As the wage gap widens between unskilled Chinese workers and their counterparts elsewhere in Asia and in Africa, as many as 85 million factory jobs could leave China in the coming years.

Africa’s poor infrastructure and uneven distribution of skills do erode its cost advantages. The World Bank estimates that a Chinese worker making shirts can produce about twice as many per shift as an Ethiopian worker.  Hisense faces the same skills gap. The home-appliance maker’s challenge was how to hire technicians and engineers in a country—and on a continent—where there aren’t many to go around. “South Africa doesn’t have an unemployment problem. It has an unemployable problem,” says the company’s factory manager.

China’s expanding African footprint has caused friction. A recent survey reported that 46% of Africans have a negative impression of Chinese employment practices, while only 19% are positive. One reason: The common Chinese response to productivity gaps has been to send more Chinese workers. China dispatched 214,534 workers to Africa in 2013.

Classroom discussion questions:
1. What issues must operations managers consider when opening new plants in Africa?

2. What might cause the Africans to have negative views of their Chinese investors and employers?

OM in the News: Straining the African Hamburger Supply Chain

Johnny Rockets in Lagos, Nigeria
Johnny Rockets in Lagos, Nigeria

“It ain’t easy bringing Africa the hamburger,” writes The Wall Street Journal (Dec.10, 2013). In the past year, Johnny Rockets in Nigeria opened its first retro diner on the continent, and Burger King cut the ribbon on the first of at least 200 restaurants it plans for South Africa and nearby countries. Next year, Hardee’s plans to build eateries in Nigeria and South Africa. Some of the burger world’s biggest names are introducing the American culinary classic to Africa’s expanding consumer class.

But that quest is straining a supply chain that is short on the refrigerated trucks and warehouses needed to keep patties and vegetable toppings fresh. And in many places, Africans are consuming beef at a faster clip than cattle ranchers can deliver new cows, meaning beef prices keep climbing. That is testing the limits of what the continent’s young urbanites can afford. For hamburger chains, the biggest problem is getting meat. From Nigeria to Namibia, slaughterhouses rely on local herdsman as a source of beef.

But herdsman come and go. That prompted Burger King to invest $5 million in a local cattle ranch that is gearing up to churn out 1.2 million Whopper patties a week. In Nigeria, meat supplier Chi Ltd. is one of several agribusinesses building ranches in anticipation of the new burger chains. The problem is, Nigerian cattle tend to be pretty scrawny. And the ideal burger source, the European brown cow, succumbs to tropical disease here.

Johnny Rockets’ final product is pricey. To give an authentic taste of the U.S., they fly in onions, mushrooms and iceberg lettuce. Burgers start at $14 for the Rocket Single, a lone patty topped with a Cheddar slice.

Classroom discussion questions:
1. Compare the supply chain problems in Africa to those of entering more developed countries.

2. Besides the food supply chain, what other obstacles do restaurant chains face in Africa?

OM in the News: Complexity of the African Supply Chain

While the aftermath of the Japanese earthquake is causing many companies to worry about the auto and electronics supply chains, a different pall is hanging over a supply chain in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The substance in question is a rare earth metal called tantalum, and the Congo is the world’s 3rd largest producer of this ingredient key to smartphones, tablets, and computers. The Wall Street Journal (April 27,2011) reports that Intel, AT&T, H-P, and other big technology companies are caught in a new SEC rule that requires them to report if  their supply chain includes tantalum coming  from war-torn regions of Africa. Key minerals, according to the law, cannot come from the Congo’s rebel-controlled mines.

I have to admit that I did not know much about such “rare earths” until we blogged about neodymium . At that time China cut its exports of that metal by 3/4 to save supplies for its own electronics manufacturers. China makes 97% of the world’s neodymium, dysprosium, and didymium.

The complex African supply chain means that US companies don’t really know who they are buying from. They purchase finished products through suppliers that source from smelters,which in turn buy from traders on the ground. Intel, Dell, TriQuint, AT&T, and Microsoft are all scrambling to work with suppliers to track the minerals. AT&T, hoping for an exemption,  estimates it would have to wade through 35 manufacturers, 60-80 parts suppliers, 1,060 commodity-part suppliers, and an unknown number of brokers and distributors to get to the mine that is the source of its tantalum.

Just as Ford recently discovered that a 3rd tier supplier in Japan was the sole source for 3 paint pigments for its autos, manufacturers around the world are finding that complex supply chains are an OM function that needs to be monitored and managed.

Discussion questions:

1. Why is it so difficult to manage global supply chains such as this one in the Congo?

2. What alternatives do manufacturers have in replacing rare earth suppliers?