
“If you build it, I’ll buy it,” said Juan Trippe, the head of Pan American World Airways.
“If you buy it, I’ll build it,” countered Bill Allen, the president of the Boeing.
Remarkably, barely three years after a handshake agreement, the Boeing 747 rolled out of a giant factory north of Seattle. It quickly made global air travel more affordable than it had ever been. This week, 53 years after the first Pan Am passenger flights between New York and London, the 1,574th — and last — Boeing 747 took to the skies.
The 747 was nearly three times the size and capacity of any jet airliner at the time, and with that distinctive double-decker bulge, it looked like none of its predecessors. All told, 747s have carried more than six billion passengers 60 billion nautical miles, the equivalent of 144,000 trips to the moon and back.

The “Queen of the Skies” is passing out of fashion because nimbler, more energy efficient jetliners with just two engines have come along to do a better job of getting people from point to point internationally. In the mid-90s, Boeing introduced the two-engine 777, which was about as big as the 747, but more advanced and efficient. A decade later, Boeing’s main rival, Airbus, debuted the A380, which can carry more passengers than the 747. But Airbus struggled to sell the plane and ended production in 2019.
The 747 is composed of about 6 million parts produced all over the world. But the final work of assembling them into an airplane was completed at a factory in Everett, Washington. That plant, regarded as the world’s largest building by volume, was built for the 747 in the 1960s.
The final 747 went to Apex Logistics, a huge transport company, which still views it as an ideal choice because of its reliability and ability to fly huge amounts of goods.
Classroom discussion questions:
- Figure 2.5 in your Heizer/Render/Munson text illustrates the life cycle of 10 products. Where do the current Boeing planes (737 Max, 747, 777, and 787) each fall?
- Why was the 13 year life cycle of Airbus’ Superjumbo A380 so much briefer?


world, says USA Today (Feb.14,2011), trumping Airbus’ A380