OM in the News: Chinese Manufacturers Head for South Carolina

Ni Meijuan (center) at Keer's S.C. factory
Ni Meijuan (center) at Keer’s S.C. factory

Twenty-five years ago, Ni Meijuan earned $19 a month working the spinning machines at a vast textile factory in China. Now at the Keer Group’s cotton mill in South Carolina, Ni is training American workers to do the job she used to do. “They’re quick learners,” she said. “But they have to learn to be quicker.”

Once the epitome of cheap mass manufacturing, textile producers from formerly low-cost nations are starting to set up shop in America, reports The New York Times (Aug. 3, 2015). It is part of a blurring between high- and low-cost manufacturing nations that few would have predicted a decade ago. Textile production in China is becoming increasingly unprofitable after years of rising wages, higher energy bills, and mounting logistical costs.

At the same time, manufacturing costs in the United States are becoming more competitive. In S.C., Keer has found residents desperate for work, as well as access to cheap and abundant land and energy and heavily subsidized cotton. Politicians have raced to ply Keer with grants and tax breaks to bring back manufacturing jobs once thought to be lost forever. “The reasons for Keer coming here? Incentives, land, the environment, the workers,” said Keer’s chairman. “Everybody believed that China would always be cheaper,” said a partner at Boston Consulting. “But things are changing even faster than anyone imagined.” In the U.S., manufacturing wages have risen less than 30% since 2004, to $22.32 an hour. Yarn production costs in China are now 30% higher than in the U.S.

From 2000 to 2014, Chinese companies invested $46 billion on new projects in the U.S., with the Carolinas home to at least 20 Chinese manufacturers. Shrinking manufacturing jobs have spurred a willingness in places like S.C. to work for lower pay, making them increasingly attractive production bases. Global manufacturers have also been drawn to right-to-work states, where there is little unionization.

Classroom discussion questions:

1. Why are Chinese textile manufacturers attracted to the U.S.?

2. Why S.C.?

OM in the News: China’s Massive Foxconn Facing Wage Increases

Foxconn, the giant Chinese manufacturer employing 920,000 workers,may not have been a household name a year ago. But that is rapidly changing. Business Week’s cover story recently highlighted Foxconn (see our Blog dated 9/21/10) where we learned that the firm’s products include iPads, Nokia phones, Dell computers, and HP printers.

The thrust of this WSJ article, though, is wages. Foxconn’s chairman Terry Gou is rapidly moving manufacturing inland, to 2nd tier cities where wages are only 2/3 of the more -developed coastal areas. Gou intends to expand to 1.5 million workers, with the majority inland, in the next 5 years.

And Gou plans to keep plowing billions into China. “I think in the next 20 years China won’t have a competitor” as the world’s manufacturing center, he states.

As the BusinessWeek article detailed, 11 employee suicides have caused Gou to accelerate his plans to move jobs closer to inland towns where he recruits employees.The long hours of overtime in the coastal factories, living in Gou’s dorms, and eating at his cafeterias, may have contributed to the bleak lifestyle.

Gou also raised the minimum pay for assembly line workers to about $295, more than double, starting this month.

Discussion Questions:

1. Will China still dominate the world manufacturing scene in 20 years? Where will the US lie?

2. Why isn’t Gou afraid of Vietnam, India, Brazil, or Russia?

3. How does managing wages by moving inland affect Apple, Nokia, and HP?