OM in the News: Some Good News for American Manufacturing

Desperate for good news on the economic front, The Wall Street Journal’s  lead story (Jan.19,2011) reports that last year, manufacturing created more jobs than it lost  for the 1st time in a decade.  As our semesters begin, this is an important topic to address in class (and in Ch.1).  Indeed, this is good news as we stress how important manufacturing is for any country that expects to maintain a high standard of living for its citizens.

But before we get too carried away with projections of 300,000 new manufacturing  jobs next year, let’s remember that we lost 6 million factory jobs in the past 13 years. This puts manufacturing  jobs at about 12 million, or about 9% of all US non-farm jobs.  We also don’t  forget that  manufacturing accounts for 11% of US economic output, down from 27% in 1950. After the steep recession slump, however, we need the growth. Manufacturing  jobs pay about $22/hour, twice the average of service jobs.

The other good news is that companies are becoming more efficient, increasing productivity 7.1% from a year earlier while hours worked grew just 3%.

And yet more good news: Whirlpool just decided to spend $120 million to open a new appliance plant  in Cleveland, instead of lower-cost Mexico. (The reasons include a better trained workforce, lower freight costs, and $30 million in incentives). And Caterpillar is building a $120 million plant in Texas to produce machines currently being shipped from its plant  in Japan to N. American customers. Finally, The Journal states that Dow is building a massive new plant in Michigan to make batteries for hybrids and electric cars. Dow claims that every new job there will have a multiplier effect of 5  jobs at suppliers.

Discussion questions:

1. Why are companies starting to create new manufacturing jobs?

2. What will affect long-term growth in such jobs in the US?

3. What are the risks facing these jobs?

OM in the News: Jobs for Americans and Pink Slips for the Chinese?

Yes, you read the headline right: “Jobs for Americans and pink slips for the Chinese”, says the quote  in the current issue of Businessweek.  It turns out companies from China are setting up shop in the US to avoid trade barriers, to capitalize on the US government’s alternative energy push, and to pick up on some of our new technologies.

For 20 years, US manufacturers have decamped to China in search of cheaper labor and parts. Now things may be turning the other way. China’s Suntech  just opened  a solar panel plant near Phoenix to bring the company closer to its American customers (which means big savings on shipping costs) and into compliance with “Buy American” government contracts. Tiajin Pipe is opening a $1 billion steel pipe mill near Corpus Christi, Texas, to circumvent 63% US tariffs. Tiajin will employ 500-600 people. Beijing’s Pacific Century Motors just bought Michigan-based Nexteer Automotive, a car part manufacturer, and employs 3,600 workers in Saginaw.

 Letting  in Chinese companies isn’t as controversial now that the US is bleeding manufacturing jobs. With unemployment hovering near 10%, US officials have put aside concerns about unfair Chinese competition. “Chinese companies, thanks to government-backed loans, monopolies, and preferential treatment, are awash in cash and should be a source for investment in the US economy–investment that would help maintain and create jobs in the US”,  wrote the US ambassador to China  in a diplomatic cable on Jan.28,2010, which was recently disclosed by WikiLeaks.

How does this relate to pink slips in China?  Suntech is using more advanced equipment in Arizona than in its home plant in Wuxi.  Here, 30 Americans are producing the same number of solar panels as 100 Chinese. “If it works well, we can integrate the same manufacturing technology in China”, says the plant manager. “This would help Suntech China make a manpower reduction”. Perhaps this is the 1st turnabout in US-Chinese relations.

Discussion questions:

1. What are the benefits and dangers to the US  of  Chinese plants opening here?

2. What happened when  a China oil company tried to buy Unocal for $18 billion in 2005? Why the change?