OM in the News: Kraft Foods Fixes Its Factories

Workers check the sliced ham as it is packaged at the new plant in Iowa.

“For decades, Kraft Foods produced Oscar Mayer cold cuts out of a 6-story, former slaughterhouse built in 1872,” reports The Wall Street Journal (Feb. 13, 2018). The systems seemed out of another era. Workers drove forklifts loaded with giant vats of ham, turkey and chicken parts on and off freight elevators to different processing points. A typical turkey breast required 4 rides between floors to get from raw meat to packaged slices. Breakdowns could slow production to a crawl. The inefficiency was easy to spot for 3G Capital, which took over Kraft in 2015.

3G started by moving production to a new, $225 million plant, where the first cold cuts rolled off the assembly line in June. Gone are the elevators. Instead, conveyor belts whisk “stick meat”—macerated proteins stuffed into 6-foot-long casings—through processing rooms. New machines can handle 15,000-pound batches. Robotic arms pick up trays and place them in room-size ovens. Automated slicers deliver perfect 9-ounce portions that drop into plastic containers.

Changing the open-floor plan of the old plant to one with separated work rooms means less downtime from sanitizing the lines. In the slicing room, cooked stick meat enters one end of a carving machine and emerges in identical sets of cold cuts that drop into containers, which have been folded into shape seconds before from plastic sheets. Sensors in the conveyor belt weigh each portion, automatically pushing away extra slices.

When it hits full capacity in a few weeks, the plant will be able to churn out 2.8 million pounds of sliced meat a week, about 17% more than the old factory, while employing 500 fewer people. “We look at pretty much any opportunity we have to drive efficiency,” says Kraft’s supply chain head.

In the broader overhaul of nationwide production, 3G used computer modeling to analyze where it sourced ingredients, where it needed to ship finished products, and the cost and availability of labor and other resources.

Classroom discussion questions:

  1. How did the reorganization and move improve productivity?
  2. What OM techniques were used to guide the changes?

 

OM in the News: US Productivity Gains Make Manufacturing More Competitive

Two recent articles in the Wall Street Journal provide some good talking points as you start your new semester, discussing productivity in Chapter 1. The first piece (Jan.12,2012), reminds us that manufacturing employment in the US has declined steadily in the past 6 decades. And despite a growth of 334,000 jobs in the past two years, we are still down 2.3 million factory jobs since the recession began. “That’s not to say American manufacturing is withering,” writes the Journal. “Factories have been producing more with fewer workers.” Productivity is up an amazing 40% since 2007 as producers have adopted new technologies, with  better-skilled workers whose wages are staying low.  And,  “Productivity, in the long run, is good. US manufacturing may do ok in the  decade ahead,” especially as the cost of manufacturing overseas  narrows. Modern factory  jobs that require “brainpower often pay well and are secure.”

The second Journal  piece (Jan.6,2012)  cites sharply lower costs in the US relative to Canada and describes how US manufacturers have become more competitive globally because of efficiency, flexible work standards, and increased automation. The US, with a decrease of 13% per unit of output since a decade earlier, has outperformed Germany (where costs are up 2% ), Canada (up 18%), and Korea (up 15%). This means some manufacturers are bringing production back to the US, partly to reduce logistical snarls and to take advantage of the cheap dollar and cheap natural gas.

In particular, the article cites Caterpillar (moving  jobs from Ontario, to Illinois, where wages are 1/2 of what they are in Canada),  Navistar (from Ontario to Ohio  for lower wages and more flexible work rules), Electrolux (from Quebec to Tennessee), and Siemens (from Ontario to North Carolina). There is a short video embedded in the Journal article.

Discussion questions:

1. Will the US ever recover the full number of manufacturing  jobs lost?

2. Why has productivity increased so dramatically in US factories?