Good OM Reading: Jeff Immelt’s “Hot Seat”

Why would Jeff Immelt write a book about his troubled tenure as GE’s CEO from 2001 to 2017? “My tenure had ended badly,” he acknowledges on page 1 of Hot Seat. “My legacy was, at best, controversial.”

Less than a week into Immelt’s tenure, replacing the famous Jack Welch, the 9/11 terrorist attacks shook the nation, and the company, to its core. GE was connected to nearly every part of the tragedy—GE-financed planes powered by GE-manufactured engines had just destroyed real estate that was insured by GE-issued policies. Immelt would lead GE through many more dire moments, from the 2008–09 Global Financial Crisis to the 2011 meltdown of Fukushima’s GE-designed nuclear reactors. He set out to make GE more global, more rooted in technology, and more diverse. But GE struggled. “It became clear right away that my main role would be Person to Blame,” he says.

In Hot Seat, Immelt offers a candid interrogation of his tenure. The most crucial component of leadership, he writes, is the willingness to make decisions. But knowing what to do is a thousand times easier than knowing when to do it. Perseverance, combined with clear communication, can ensure progress, if not perfection, he says.

Immelt rose through the ranks during a largely “tranquil” time when China was a sleeping giant and the U.S. economy expanded at a reliably impressive rate. The world he inherited as CEO, however, was “raucous, volatile and unpredictable,” full of bursting bubbles (dot-com, housing, power), disruptive rivals and increased scrutiny. 

Hot Seat provides interesting OM insights and is worth the read. Here is one quote: “It may sound weird to say it, but I am certain that I would never have become GE’s CEO if I hadn’t first learned to fix refrigerators. In 1989, however, when GE moved me to Louisville to become head of customer service for GE Appliances, I wasn’t so sure it was a promotion. GE’s refrigerators had begun failing at an alarming rate. The problem, we soon figured out, was faulty compressors, which have to work harder when the weather gets hot. So the hotter it got, the more our compressors failed. First, we heard from customers in Puerto Rico. Then Florida. After a little investigation, we determined that every single compressor inside 3.3 million refrigerators was going to fail, one by one, in a wave that would roll across the country from the warmest spots to the coolest. We figured refrigerators in Maine would be the last to give out, but their time would come. Each repair would cost us $210—more than half what customers had paid in the first place. It was a disaster.”

Many critics would say Immelt’s entire tenure was a disaster as well.

OM in the News: GE’s Once Every 40 Year Location Decision

GE CEOGE plans to make a decision shortly on whether to move its headquarters of more than 40 years from Connecticut, a choice prompted by what the company considers an inhospitable climate for business in the state. The company has been weighing overtures from other states including NY and Georgia that are eager to lure the $150 billion firm, reports The Wall Street Journal (Sept. 11, 2105).

GE’s considerations expand beyond local issues and tax rates. It is looking at the voting records of each state’s lawmakers on national policy issues, such as the fight to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank. The company considers the bank vital to its exports of heavy machinery. GE never even considered a bid by Cincinnati—where GE is currently shifting hundreds of back-office jobs, and which is also the hometown of CEO  Jeff Immelt—because of opposition from some Ohio politicians to reauthorizing the Ex-Im Bank. The same holds true for Dallas.

The company was considering various factors in deciding whether and where to move its head office from Fairfield, where it has been since 1974. GE isn’t approaching the decision lightly. Relocating is “the kind of thing you only think about every 40 years, so you want to make sure you get it right,” said Immelt. Most of GE’s facilities to manufacture heavy equipment like power turbines, jet engines and locomotives are in other states such as South Carolina, Ohio and Texas. GE currently employs 4,900 people in Connecticut, of which 800 work at the corporate headquarters in Fairfield. One of the changes in the Connecticut budget that GE took issue with was a cap on the amount of prior-year tax losses companies could use to offset their taxes. Connecticut officials say the state will make efforts to keep GE at the “right price.”

Classroom discussion questions:

  1. Why is this such a critical decision?
  2. Why did Boeing move its corporate HQ a few years ago from Washington State to Chicago?

OM in the News: GE Decides Making Stuff is the Future

An interesting way to end this semester–or start next semester– is through a series of quotes from GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt in a major story in the New York Times (Dec.5,2010). GE, as you probably know, lost 3/4 of its market value with the recent financial crisis–hit harder than any company not in the banking sector, because of its finance arm called GE Capital. With a heritage of industrial innovation going back to Edison’s light bulb, GE lost its way to GE Capital’s cash machine that bolstered the bottom line for over a decade.

GE, according to Immelt, “must rely more on making physical products and less on financial engineering–a path that …is also necessary for the American economy as a whole.…Many bought into the idea that America could go from a technology-based, export-oriented powerhouse to a services-led consumption-based economy–and still expect to prosper. That idea was flat wrong”.

“Technology-based manufacturing of all sorts has to be the central part of reinvigorating the economy”, he adds. A White House advisory board has called for doubling US manufacturing employment, to 20% of the workforce. (Refer to Figure 1.4 and Table 1.3 in the text). GE, by the way, is the 2nd largest US exporter, after Boeing.

The products where GE has competitive advantage and a strong manufacturing presence are: next generation jet engines, power turbines, locomotives, nuclear plants, water-treatment systems, medical-imaging equipment, solar panels, and windmills. GE plans to add 4,000 manufacturing jobs in the US.

GE  is stating what is becoming increasingly obvious. We must get back to basics in this country, creating not just services, but goods as well. Nations that do not produce goods sought by others will not be able to compete in the competitive global economy.

Discussion questions:

1. What if  we do continue to become a service driven-economy, with fewer and fewer jobs in manufacturing?

2. Why the change in GE’s attitude?

3. Can we ever revert to making most of the goods we consume, or will China be our biggest supplier for decades to come?