Guest Post: Hershey’s $1 Billion “Sweet Spot” Supply Chain Investment

Dr. Misty Blessley is Associate Professor of Supply Chain Management at Temple University.

The Hershey Company, a confectionery and salty snacks giant headquartered in Hershey, Pennsylvania, struggled to meet heightened customer demand for Halloween candy last year because of limited production capacity. Due to a new Hershey’s line and three new Reese’s lines, the problems of last season are now behind the manufacturer. As recently reported in Supply Chain Dive, the firm views its $1 billion investment “as a growth enabler rather than an expense to manage.” Hershey considers their “Sweet Spot” as being nimble enough to react to demand growth, while having the capacity needed to meet customers’ needs.

Hershey’s investment is expected to be a multi-year undertaking, which will allow the candy giant to balance existing capacity with future flexibility. Plans include an additional chocolate factory in Hershey, 13 new production lines and upgrades to 11 existing lines. Core brands will be in focus, with 60% of the investment allocated to the Reese’s brand. With flexibility and agility as an objective, Hershey’s is implementing modular advanced technology lines that use robotics and automation. These lines allow for smaller production runs and shorter changeover times.

Reese’s candies funnel through a Hershey production line

In addition to adding capacity, Hershey’s has also found hidden capacity by using advanced analytics and AI. For example, an evaluation of the network of six KitKat production lines resulted in finding $35 million of capacity that could be leveraged without a substantial investment. The company also considered underutilized production lines and what products might be suitable to outsource to a co-manufacturer, rather than being made in-house. As a result, Hershey recently outsourced its production of Zero candy bars, and used that to free up capacity to make PayDay candy bars.

When determining what products to use a co-manufacturer for, Hershey had two considerations. If it’s a core product with intellectual property Hershey wants to protect, production is kept in-house. If it’s a product at the end of its lifecycle or a new product the company doesn’t want to commit a large investment in yet, Hershey will consider shifting production to an outside manufacturer.

Classroom discussion questions:

1. Refer to Supplement 7 of the Heizer/Render/Munson text. Which of the tactics for matching capacity to demand is Hershey applying?
2. How has Hershey benefitted from taking a multi-faceted approach to manufacturing capacity, beyond simply adding capacity?

OM in the News: Intel’s Chip Shortages

A shortage of high-end computer chips from Intel is being felt in other parts of the tech sector, reports The Wall Street Journal (Sept. 24, 2018). The question is how far it might spread.

Intel supplies the vast majority of CPU chips for the PC market today. Most are produced with circuitry measured at 14-nanometers—the most advanced manufacturing node Intel currently has in mass production. Intel has three facilities capable of producing chips at that level, but those facilities are also in high demand for the type of processors that power data centers, which is Intel’s business line with the best growth. Some of that capacity is also now going toward producing modem chips used in the latest generation of iPhones, which just hit stores.

Intel, in other words, has many demanding customers competing for a finite amount of manufacturing capacity. And while the company has already boosted its planned capital expenditure for the year by $1 billion, such facilities can’t be expanded quickly—especially while the company is struggling to shift some of its production to a new, more advanced 10-nanometer process. That makes it difficult to respond to rapid changes in the market, like the recent surprising jump in PC demand. Second quarter PC shipments grew globally for the first time in six years.

Server-chip demand is also booming, fueled mostly by capital spending from tech giants like Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook, which are building data centers to power cloud-based services. Those four invested over $34 billion in the first 6 months of this year, up 59% from a year earlier.  Capital spending by big tech companies could slow if those they aren’t able to get enough server processors to meet their own expansion plans.

Classroom discussion questions:

  1. Why is Intel unable to fully meet current chip demand?
  2. Who are Intel’s main customers and what is Intel’s main product?