OM in the News: Why GE Decided to Reshore Appliance Production

It seems that after decades of neglect, GE has a newfound love affair with its appliance manufacturing division. Manufacturing & Technology News (Feb. 28, 2012) reports that the 122-year-old company is reinvigorating its 900 acre Appliance Park in Louisville with a $1 billion investment in designers, engineers, workers, and production systems to produce a new line of innovative products. And for the first time, it is applying the lean methodology to all of its operations.

In moving production back to the US from China, GE decided that every aspect of its water heaters, for example, needed to be redesigned through a team approach under a lean planning system that included GE’s sales division, designers, product and process engineers, accountants, execs, workers, retailers, and customers (including the plumbers that install them). In the process, it made the unit more affordable, reducing the retail price from $1,600 (when made in Asia) to $1,200 when made in Louisville. The bright and modern factory production line, with visual controls, uses the common lean practice of a “pull” system based on demand.

Why did GE reshore?  “What you have to look at is the total cost of the whole product,” says one GE exec. “When you make a product far away from where consumers buy it, you have costs of shipping, duties, customs and you have to carry more inventory. You can respond faster if your factory is domestic. The whole notion of going to the cheapest labor place isn’t always the best answer.”

Adds the local union leader, a partner in the reshoring effort: “Lean takes the waste out of a process. We become more competitive with Mexico or China.” (Please note that this magazine requires a $495 subscription fee).

Discussion questions:

1. Why did the union back lean production, when its efficiencies usually mean fewer workers are needed on the line?

2. Why is GE reshoring its appliance division to the US, yet sending its x-ray headquarters to China (as noted recently in our blog)?

OM in the News: Starbucks’ Lean Teams Slowing Down

I always like to use Starbucks examples in class. Its the kind of “hip” company that students can relate to. Over the past few years , Starbucks has been applying lean manufacturing techniques to study every move its baristas make in order to shave seconds off each order. Chapter 1 in our text has an OM in Action box describing these productivity improvements.

But The Wall Street Journal (Oct.13, 2010)  just reported that Starbucks now wants to reign in its baristas, an act that will result in longer lines and waits.   Baristas are being told to stop making multiple drinks at one time, to steam milk one drink at a time instead of a pitcher at a time, to rinse pitchers after each use, and to use 1 espresso machine instead of 2.

Why would the company do this?  The new methods have “doubled the amount of time it  takes to make some drinks” says one employee. But the company  is concerned  about quality, with customers indicating that Starbucks espresso drinks are just “average”.

It is definitely an interesting class topic to see the lean techniques being reversed and I am sure many students will have a comment about such changes.

Discussion questions:

1. Why would baristas be opposed to slowing down the process?

2. What are some of the lean techniques the company has introduced over the years?

3. What other changes has Starbucks made recently in product and process?

OM in the News(and Video): Ford’s Lean Auto Plant in Brazil

Ford’s most progressive plant in the world may well be in northeast Brazil, where it uses lean manufacturing, sophisticated supply chains, and a vast array of robotics to produce the EcoSport SUV and Fiesta. A  colleague in that country, who is using the Portuguese edition of our text,  just emailed me the link to a video about which he is justifiably proud.  This 3.5 minute video illustrates all 3 concepts: lean, SCM, and automation and makes a nice presentation in Ch11 or Ch.16. (I do need to warn you that the last few seconds are a bit anti-union).

In 2009, the Ford plant produced over 207,000 vehicles. This South American operation brings so much profit to the parent company in Dearborn,Michigan,that the firm was able to turn down federal loans in 2009 that both GM and Chrysler accepted.

Brazil is becoming a leader in lean auto making, with another plant churning out VWs with a similar layout in which suppliers produce, on-site, with their own employees, the parts that are installed in the final vehicle. If you look at the Global Company Profile that opens Ch.16 in our text, you will see a  layout at the Toyota Tundra plant in San Antonio, Texas that also resembles what we see in the video.

Discussion Questions:

1. Why is it doubtful that this Ford plant will be replicated in the US?

2. How does the supply chain differ from most US plants?

3. Why is this an example of lean manufaturing?